alexa A comparison of the management of hypertensive patients by nurse practitioners compared with conventional hospital care.
Nursing

Nursing

Journal of Nursing & Care

Author(s): Curzio JL, Rubin PC, Kennedy SS, Reid JL

Abstract Share this page

Abstract Patients with hypertension (n = 198) managed by a nurse practitioner hypertension clinic (NPC) were compared over a four-year period with an age-sex matched group of patients attending conventional hospital hypertension outpatient clinics (CHC) for follow-up in two other hospitals in the same city. Mortality is reported for an additional two years from initial presentation. There was no difference between the groups for initial supine systolic or diastolic blood pressure, weight, obesity index, alcohol use, cholesterol or glucose. The reported causes of hypertension were similar. There were more smokers initially in the CHC (46\% vs. 37\%). Initial drug treatment was less varied in the NPC. At the end of one year there was no significant weight loss in either group, and drug treatment was broadly similar between the two groups. Those attending the NPC, however, had a greater decrease in both supine systolic blood pressure (P less than 0.05) and diastolic blood pressure (P less than 0.01). At the end of four years there were 136 patients (69\%) attending the NPC and 70 (35\%) remaining in the CHC. For those remaining systolic blood pressure control was similar. Diastolic blood pressures were lower in the NPC (P less than 0.001). Mortality was not significantly different between the groups over a six-year period. This study shows that a nurse practitioner clinic can control blood pressure in a greater proportion of patients, maintain contact with more efficient follow-up of a greater percentage of patients and collect the information needed to assess the effectiveness of care over the long term.
This article was published in J Hum Hypertens and referenced in Journal of Nursing & Care

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords