alexa A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation.


Journal of Cancer Science & Therapy

Author(s): Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, Takada N, Lee S,

Abstract Share this page

Abstract BACKGROUND: A direct comparison of open operation and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for radical oesophagectomy has yet to be published. METHODS: Medical records of 149 patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent oesophagectomy and three-field lymphadenectomy were reviewed. Seventy-seven patients had the thoracic procedure performed via a 5-cm minithoracotomy and four ports (VATS group); the others were operated on by conventional posterolateral thoracotomy (open group). RESULTS: The mean number of retrieved mediastinal nodes, blood loss and morbidity were similar in the VATS and open groups (33.9 versus 32.8 nodes, 284 versus 310 g, and 32 versus 38 per cent respectively). The thoracic procedure took longer in patients having VATS than in the control group (227 versus 186 min; P = 0.031). Vital capacity reduction was less with VATS than in the open group (15 versus 22 per cent; P = 0.016). The 3- and 5-year survival rates were similar: 70 and 55 per cent respectively for VATS compared with 60 and 57 per cent for the open procedure. CONCLUSION: VATS provides comparable results to open radical oesophagectomy, with less surgical trauma. Copyright 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This article was published in Br J Surg and referenced in Journal of Cancer Science & Therapy

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version