alexa A two-colour chewing gum test for masticatory efficiency: development of different assessment methods.



Author(s): Schimmel M, Christou P, Herrmann F, Mller F

Abstract Share this page

Abstract OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate different assessment methods of a two-colour chewing gum test for masticatory efficiency to determine its validity for research and clinical purposes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty adult volunteers, eleven women and nine men (mean age of 27.5 years), participated in this study. All participants perceived their masticatory efficiency as normal. The task was to chew five samples of a two-colour chewing gum for 5, 10, 20, 30 and 50 cycles respectively. Maximum bite force was measured. All samples were assessed twice by two independent operators both, as 'bolus' and after flattening to 1 mm thick 'wafers'. The latter were scanned and the unmixed pixels counted using Adobe Photoshop Elements to calculate the ratio of unmixed colour to the total surface. RESULTS: Digital image processing confirmed a significant correlation between colour mixing and chewing duration (P < 0.001). Subjective assessment proved less accurate with fair to substantial intra-examiner agreement for 'bolus' (0.20 < kappa < 0.63) and substantial to almost perfect agreement for 'wafer' (0.60 < kappa < 0.88). Inter-examiner agreement was consistently moderate or substantial only for specimen chewed 20 cycles or longer. No significant correlation was found between the colour mixture and the maximum bite force. CONCLUSION: Digital image processing of the two-colour chewing gum test specimen provides reliable quantitative data for chewing efficiency. Visual assessments were less reliable but might still be useful in screening for chewing deficiencies in a clinical setting. In this context, the test should be performed with a flattened specimen chewed, probably for 20 cycles. This article was published in J Oral Rehabil and referenced in Dentistry

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version