alexa Acceptance of flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy for screening and surveillance in colorectal cancer prevention.


Journal of Biosensors & Bioelectronics

Author(s): Nicholson FB, Korman MG

Abstract Share this page

Abstract OBJECTIVES: To study an individual's experience of either flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) or colonoscopy in a colorectal cancer prevention programme. METHODS: Consecutive individuals in a Bowel Cancer Prevention Programme, who had either an unsedated FS or a colonoscopy with sedation, participated in a prospective cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. RESULTS: A total of 447 responses were obtained for 256 colonoscopies and 191 FSs (200 men [45\%] and 247 women [55\%]). The overall experience of colonoscopy was more comfortable than FS (75\% versus 18\%; P<0.001). Embarrassment was low for both procedures (8\%). There was no pain associated with colonoscopy and most individuals had a pain score of less than 3 (11-point scale) for FS: 72\% of men, 55\% of women (P<0.001). Most individuals did not have a gender preference for the endoscopist. For colonoscopy, the worst part of the procedure was the preparation (78\%) and for FS the preparation and the procedure ranked equally worst (30\%). CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that colonoscopy with sedation is a very comfortable procedure. FS is more uncomfortable than colonoscopy; however, for the majority it is a tolerable experience. Women found FS only slightly more painful than men. The worst part of either procedure was the preparation. Embarrassment with either procedure was minimal. Both procedures are well tolerated and suitable for colorectal cancer screening. This article was published in J Med Screen and referenced in Journal of Biosensors & Bioelectronics

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version