alexa Adaptive nonadaptive proton radiation planning and outcomes in a phase II trial for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Oncology

Oncology

Journal of Nuclear Medicine & Radiation Therapy

Author(s): Koay EJ, Lege D, Mohan R, Komaki R, Cox JD,

Abstract Share this page

Abstract PURPOSE: To analyze dosimetric variables and outcomes after adaptive replanning of radiation therapy during concurrent high-dose protons and chemotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nine of 44 patients with stage III NSCLC in a prospective phase II trial of concurrent paclitaxel/carboplatin with proton radiation [74 Gy(RBE) in 37 fractions] had modifications to their original treatment plans after re-evaluation revealed changes that would compromise coverage of the target volume or violate dose constraints; plans for the other 35 patients were not changed. We compared patients with adaptive plans with those with nonadaptive plans in terms of dosimetry and outcomes. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 21.2 months (median overall survival, 29.6 months), no differences were found in local, regional, or distant failure or overall survival between groups. Adaptive planning was used more often for large tumors that shrank to a greater extent (median, 107.1 cm(3) adaptive and 86.4 cm(3) nonadaptive; median changes in volume, 25.3\% adaptive and 1.2\% nonadaptive; P<.01). The median number of fractions delivered using adaptive planning was 13 (range, 4-22). Adaptive planning generally improved sparing of the esophagus (median absolute decrease in V(70), 1.8\%; range, 0\%-22.9\%) and spinal cord (median absolute change in maximum dose, 3.7 Gy; range, 0-13.8 Gy). Without adaptive replanning, target coverage would have been compromised in 2 cases (57\% and 82\% coverage without adaptation vs 100\% for both with adaptation); neither patient experienced local failure. Radiation-related grade 3 toxicity rates were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adaptive planning can reduce normal tissue doses and prevent target misses, particularly for patients with large tumors that shrink substantially during therapy. Adaptive plans seem to have acceptable toxicity and achieve similar local, regional, and distant control and overall survival, even in patients with larger tumors, vs nonadaptive plans. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00495170. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
This article was published in Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys and referenced in Journal of Nuclear Medicine & Radiation Therapy

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords