alexa AMO array multifocal lens versus monofocal correction in cataract surgery.
General Science

General Science

Biological Systems: Open Access

Author(s): Brydon KW, Tokarewicz AC, Nichols BD, Brydon KW, Tokarewicz AC, Nichols BD

Abstract Share this page

Abstract PURPOSE: To compare the functional capabilities of 15 patients (30 eyes) who had implantation of the Allergan Medical Optics (AMO) Array multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) with those of 13 patients (26 eyes) with an AMO monofocal IOL. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Western Ontario, Canada. METHODS: The objective capabilities of both groups were analyzed through visual acuity measurements for distance, near, and depth of focus. Subjective functionality was assessed through the use of a questionnaire that included the previously validated VF-14 index of visual function, a global measure of overall satisfaction with visual acuity, and questions related to the frequency of spectacle wear. RESULTS: Both groups had excellent corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity postoperatively. The multifocal group had better acuity than the monofocal group at near with distance correction in place (70\% versus 43\% achieved J3 or better). The multifocal group also had significantly better depth of focus. Subjectively, both groups indicated high levels of satisfaction with visual function. However, the multifocal group indicated higher levels of satisfaction during the day, at night, and overall without spectacles. This result translated into less spectacle wear for both near and distance in the multifocal group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate high patient satisfaction with the Array multifocal IOL and greater functional independence from spectacle wear, by objective and subjective patient measures, than with the monofocal IOL.
This article was published in J Cataract Refract Surg and referenced in Biological Systems: Open Access

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version