Author(s): Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E,
Abstract Share this page
Abstract OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to measure the agreement, reliability, construct validity, and feasibility of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We randomly selected 30 systematic reviews from a database. Each was assessed by two reviewers using: (1) the enhanced quality assessment questionnaire (Overview of Quality Assessment Questionnaire [OQAQ]); (2) Sacks' instrument; and (3) our newly developed measurement tool (AMSTAR). We report on reliability (interobserver kappas of the 11 AMSTAR items), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of the sum scores, construct validity (ICCs of the sum scores of AMSTAR compared with those of other instruments), and completion times. RESULTS: The interrater agreement of the individual items of AMSTAR was substantial with a mean kappa of 0.70 (95\% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57, 0.83) (range: 0.38-1.0). Kappas recorded for the other instruments were 0.63 (95\% CI: 0.38, 0.78) for enhanced OQAQ and 0.40 (95\% CI: 0.29, 0.50) for the Sacks' instrument. The ICC of the total score for AMSTAR was 0.84 (95\% CI: 0.65, 0.92) compared with 0.91 (95\% CI: 0.82, 0.96) for OQAQ and 0.86 (95\% CI: 0.71, 0.94) for the Sacks' instrument. AMSTAR proved easy to apply, each review taking about 15 minutes to complete. CONCLUSIONS: AMSTAR has good agreement, reliability, construct validity, and feasibility. These findings need confirmation by a broader range of assessors and a more diverse range of reviews.
This article was published in J Clin Epidemiol
and referenced in Journal of Yoga & Physical Therapy