alexa An analysis of the Washington Conference Report on bioanalytical method validation.
Pharmaceutical Sciences

Pharmaceutical Sciences

Pharmaceutica Analytica Acta

Author(s): Hartmann C, Massart DL, McDowall RD

Abstract Share this page

Abstract The Washington Conference Report on bioanalytical method validation is analysed with respect to the requirements for precision and accuracy. It is shown that if the requirements are interpreted too literally, this could lead to disappointment in practice. A better approach is to separate the total measurement error into its constant (bias) and random (precision) components. To ensure that 95\% of all methods fall within the acceptance interval of +/- 15\% around the true value, would require, for example, the bias to be < or = 8\% and the method precision to be < or = 8\% relative standard deviation (RSD; n = 5).
This article was published in J Pharm Biomed Anal and referenced in Pharmaceutica Analytica Acta

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version