alexa An open-label controlled trial of theophylline for treatment of patients with hyposmia.
Neurology

Neurology

Journal of Neurology & Neurophysiology

Author(s): Henkin RI, Velicu I, Schmidt L

Abstract Share this page

Abstract BACKGROUND: To test the hypothesis that theophylline is effective in correcting smell loss in patients with hyposmia. METHODS: Three hundred twelve patients with smell loss (hyposmia) were evaluated to determine characteristics of their loss by psychophysical measurements of detection and recognition thresholds, magnitude estimation and hedonic values for 4 odors (pyridine, nitrobenzene, thiophene, and amyl acetate) by use of a forced-choice 3-stimuli staircase design previously documented in a double-blind study. Patients were then treated in a fixed design open-label clinical trial with oral theophylline. Drug was given in equal divided doses from 200 to 800 mg daily for 2- to 8-month periods and subjective and psychophysical measurements of smell function and blood theophylline levels were measured; results were compared with those obtained before treatment. RESULTS: Subjective smell loss improved in 157 (50.3\%) patients; smell function was considered normal by 34 (21.7\%). Overall, 10.9\% of patients in the study considered smell function returned to normal. However, measurements of mean detection and recognition thresholds improved significantly at each drug level; measurements of mean magnitude estimation and hedonic also improved. Improvement was greater at drug doses of 600 and 800 mg than at 200 or 400 mg. Once improvement occurred, as long as treatment was maintained, it persisted for as long as follow-up was measured. CONCLUSION: Theophylline was effective in improving smell function in patients with smell loss. Improvement persisted as long as treatment was continued, which extended from 6 to 72 months. This article was published in Am J Med Sci and referenced in Journal of Neurology & Neurophysiology

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords