alexa Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for fetal aneuploidies: updated meta-analysis.
Genetics & Molecular Biology

Genetics & Molecular Biology

Journal of Genetic Syndromes & Gene Therapy

Author(s): Gil MM, Quezada MS, Revello R, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH

Abstract Share this page

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To review clinical validation or implementation studies of maternal blood cell-free (cf) DNA analysis and define the performance of screening for fetal trisomies 21, 18 and 13 and sex chromosome aneuploidies. METHODS: Searches of PubMed, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library were performed to identify all peer-reviewed articles on cfDNA testing in screening for aneuploidies between January 2011, when the first such study was published, and 4 January 2015. RESULTS: In total, 37 relevant studies were identified and these were used for the meta-analysis on the performance of cfDNA testing in screening for aneuploidies. These studies reported cfDNA results in relation to fetal karyotype from invasive testing or clinical outcome. Weighted pooled detection rates (DR) and false-positive rates (FPR) in singleton pregnancies were 99.2\% (95\% CI, 98.5-99.6\%) and 0.09\% (95\% CI, 0.05-0.14\%), respectively, for trisomy 21, 96.3\% (95\% CI, 94.3-97.9\%) and 0.13\% (95\% CI, 0.07-0.20) for trisomy 18, 91.0\% (95\% CI, 85.0-95.6\%) and 0.13\% (95\% CI, 0.05-0.26\%) for trisomy 13, 90.3\% (95\% CI, 85.7-94.2\%) and 0.23\% (95\% CI, 0.14-0.34\%) for monosomy X and 93.0\% (95\% CI, 85.8-97.8\%) and 0.14\% (95\% CI, 0.06-0.24\%) for sex chromosome aneuploidies other than monosomy X. For twin pregnancies, the DR for trisomy 21 was 93.7\% (95\% CI, 83.6-99.2\%) and the FPR was 0.23\% (95\% CI, 0.00-0.92\%). CONCLUSION: Screening for trisomy 21 by analysis of cfDNA in maternal blood is superior to that of all other traditional methods of screening, with higher DR and lower FPR. The performance of screening for trisomies 18 and 13 and sex chromosome aneuploidies is considerably worse than that for trisomy 21. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article was published in Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol and referenced in Journal of Genetic Syndromes & Gene Therapy

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version