alexa Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation.
Cardiology

Cardiology

Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases & Diagnosis

Author(s): Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA,

Abstract Share this page

Abstract OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between angiographic and functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography in Multivessel Evaluation) study. BACKGROUND: It can be difficult to determine on the coronary angiogram which lesions cause ischemia. Revascularization of coronary stenoses that induce ischemia improves a patient's functional status and outcome. For stenoses that do not induce ischemia, however, the benefit of revascularization is less clear. METHODS: In the FAME study, routine measurement of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) was compared with angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. The use of the FFR in addition to angiography significantly reduced the rate of all major adverse cardiac events at 1 year. Of the 1,414 lesions (509 patients) in the FFR-guided arm of the FAME study, 1,329 were successfully assessed by the FFR and are included in this analysis. RESULTS: Before FFR measurement, these lesions were categorized into 50\% to 70\% (47\% of all lesions), 71\% to 90\% (39\% of all lesions), and 91\% to 99\% (15\% of all lesions) diameter stenosis by visual assessment. In the category 50\% to 70\% stenosis, 35\% were functionally significant (FFR 0.80). In the category 71\% to 90\% stenosis, 80\% were functionally significant and 20\% were not. In the category of subtotal stenoses, 96\% were functionally significant. Of all 509 patients with angiographically defined multivessel disease, only 235 (46\%) had functional multivessel disease (>or=2 coronary arteries with an FFR
  • DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.096
  • This article was published in J Am Coll Cardiol and referenced in Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases & Diagnosis

    Relevant Expert PPTs

    Relevant Speaker PPTs

    Recommended Conferences

    • 19th Annual Cardiology Congress
      August 31-September 01, 2017 Philadelphia, USA
    • 23rd International Conference on Heart Diseases & Angiology
      Oct 16-17, 2017 Budapest, Hungary
    • 20th European Cardiology Congress
      October 16-18, 2017 Budapest, Hungary
    • 3rd Global Summit on Heart Diseases
      November 02-04, 2017 Bangkok, Thailand
    • 22nd World Cardiology Congress
      December 11-12, 2017 Rome, Italy

    Relevant Topics

    Peer Reviewed Journals
     
    Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
    International Conferences 2017-18
     
    Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

    Contact Us

     
    © 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
    adwords