alexa Aortic stenosis: right and left ventricular function in the early postprocedural phase. Comparison between transcatheter and surgical aortic valve implantation.
Cardiology

Cardiology

Journal of Clinical & Experimental Cardiology

Author(s): Quick S, Speiser U, Pfluecke C, Youssef A, Sveric K, , Quick S, Speiser U, Pfluecke C, Youssef A, Sveric K,

Abstract Share this page

Abstract BACKGROUND: While impact of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) on the function of the right and left ventricle (RV, LV) has been studied extensively, the objective of this study was to compare the two different transcatheter approaches, transfemoral vs. transapical aortic valve implantation (tf-AVI, ta-AVI) and SAVR with respect to postoperative recovery of RV and LV function in patients with severe aortic stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Conventional echocardiographic studies were performed before and after the procedure (< 8 days) in 74 consecutive patients undergoing tf-AVI, 88 with ta-AVI and 63 surgically treated patients. Post procedure, a marked deterioration in the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) was seen after SAVR (23.7 +/- 4 mm vs. 15.6 +/- 2.9 mm, P > 0.001) and ta-AVI (21.1 +/- 4.7 mm vs. 19.1 +/- 4.7 mm, P = 0.02), while TAPSE remained unchanged in the tf-AVI group (21.7 +/- 5 mm vs. 22.1 +/- 4.9 mm, P = 0.38). Additionally, a significant drop of the visually estimated right ventricular ejection fraction in the SAVR and ta-AVI group compared to tf-AVI could be seen (P < 0.001, P = 0.003, respectively) Among patients with a pre-existing reduced LV-function, despite similar baseline LVEF (38.5 +/- 7.1\% vs. 37.4 +/- 5.6, P = 0.8), tf-AVI patients had better recovery of LVEF compared with ta-AVI (ALVEF 7.2 +/- 8\% vs. 1.6 +/- 9.3\%, P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Our study underlines the less invasive nature of tf-AVI, causing less intraoperative trauma and pericardial adhesions to the heart. Given that acute RV failure after cardiac surgery remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality, the results of the present study suggest that in high-risk patients, TAVI and in particular tf-AVI could be favoured over SAVR in regard to a RV dysfunction. This article was published in Acta Cardiol and referenced in Journal of Clinical & Experimental Cardiology

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords