alexa Are Performance Measures Necessary to Predict Loss of Independence in Elderly People? 2 ADL) over a 6-year follow-up, and 5-years mortality. RESULTS: FP and AFP yielded a frailty prevalence of 6.4\% and 6.5\%, respectively; only 32 patients were considered frail by both indices (kappa: .53). For incident disability, FP showed sensitivity = .194, specificity = .963, PPV = .400, and NPV = .903. Similarly, AFP had sensitivity = .129, specificity = .949, PPV = .245, and NPV = .894. Consistent results were found for accelerated disability and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In our sample, both FP and AFP showed low sensitivity in identifying older people who would die or develop disability, but they could well discriminate people who would not experience adverse outcomes. © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com."/>
Engineering

Engineering

International Journal of Swarm Intelligence and Evolutionary Computation

Author(s): Pedone C, Costanzo L, Cesari M, Bandinelli S, Ferrucci L, , Pedone C, Costanzo L, Cesari M, Bandinelli S, Ferrucci L, , Pedone C, Costanzo L, Cesari M, Bandinelli S, Ferrucci L, , Pedone C, Costanzo L, Cesari M, Bandinelli S, Ferrucci L,

Abstract Share this page

Abstract BACKGROUND: The frailty phenotype (FP) proposed by Fried and colleagues (Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al.; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M146-M156.) requires the administration of performance tests (gait speed, handgrip strength) not always feasible in routine clinical practice. Furthermore, the discriminative capacity of the instrument has been rarely investigated. Aim of this study was to evaluate the discriminative capacity of the FP and compare it with a modified version including only anamnestic information. METHODS: Data are from 890 participants of the InCHIANTI study without impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) at baseline (mean age 74 years, women 55\%). Frailty was defined by (a) the presence of ≥ 3 criteria of the FP, and (b) having ≥ 2 criteria of an anamnestic FP (AFP), not including gait speed and handgrip strength. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) were used to evaluate the discriminative capacity of both definitions for incident disability (ie, loss of at least one ADL), incidence of "accelerated" disability (loss of >2 ADL) over a 6-year follow-up, and 5-years mortality. RESULTS: FP and AFP yielded a frailty prevalence of 6.4\% and 6.5\%, respectively; only 32 patients were considered frail by both indices (kappa: .53). For incident disability, FP showed sensitivity = .194, specificity = .963, PPV = .400, and NPV = .903. Similarly, AFP had sensitivity = .129, specificity = .949, PPV = .245, and NPV = .894. Consistent results were found for accelerated disability and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In our sample, both FP and AFP showed low sensitivity in identifying older people who would die or develop disability, but they could well discriminate people who would not experience adverse outcomes. © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: [email protected]
This article was published in J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci and referenced in International Journal of Swarm Intelligence and Evolutionary Computation

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

  • International conference on Artificial Intelligence
    June 28-29, 2017, San Diego, USA
  • 3rd International Conference on Data Structures and Data Mining
    August 17-18, 2017, Toronto, Canada
  • 4th International Conference on BigData Analysis and Data Mining
    September 07-08, 2017, Paris, France
  • 6th International Conference on Biostatistics and Bioinformatics
    Nov 13-14, 2017, Atlanta, USA
  • 4th World Congress on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence
    October 23-24, 2017

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords