Author(s): Colombini BL, Modena KC, Calvo AM, Sakai VT, Giglio FP,
Abstract Share this page
Abstract OBJECTIVE: Comparison of the clinical efficacy of 4\% articaine in relation to 2\% mepivacaine, both with 1:100,000 epinephrine, in the prevention of postoperative pain after lower third molar removal. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty patients underwent removal of bilateral lower third molars under local anesthesia (articaine or mepivacaine) in 2 separate appointments, in a double-blind, randomized, and crossed manner. Objective and subjective parameters were recorded for paired comparison of postoperative courses. RESULTS: Duration of analgesia provided by articaine and mepivacaine was 198.00 +/- 25.86, and 125.40 +/- 13.96 min, respectively (P = .02), whereas the duration of anesthesia was 273.80 +/- 15.94 and 216.85 +/- 20.15 min, respectively (P = .06). Both solutions exerted no important effects upon arterial pressure, heart rate, or oxygen saturation (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Articaine provides a longer period of analgesic effect and a tendency for a longer period of anesthesia as compared to mepivacaine. The presence of a vasoconstrictor agent in local anesthetic solutions does not seem to influence hemodynamic parameters during lower third molar removal in healthy subjects.
This article was published in Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
and referenced in Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability