alexa Assessing the accuracy of an inter-institutional automated patient-specific health problem list.


Internal Medicine: Open Access

Author(s): Poissant L, Taylor L, Huang A, Tamblyn R

Abstract Share this page

Abstract BACKGROUND: Health problem lists are a key component of electronic health records and are instrumental in the development of decision-support systems that encourage best practices and optimal patient safety. Most health problem lists require initial clinical information to be entered manually and few integrate information across care providers and institutions. This study assesses the accuracy of a novel approach to create an inter-institutional automated health problem list in a computerized medical record (MOXXI) that integrates three sources of information for an individual patient: diagnostic codes from medical services claims from all treating physicians, therapeutic indications from electronic prescriptions, and single-indication drugs. METHODS: Data for this study were obtained from 121 general practitioners and all medical services provided for 22,248 of their patients. At the opening of a patient's file, all health problems detected through medical service utilization or single-indication drug use were flagged to the physician in the MOXXI system. Each new arising health problem were presented as 'potential' and physicians were prompted to specify if the health problem was valid (Y) or not (N) or if they preferred to reassess its validity at a later time. RESULTS: A total of 263,527 health problems, representing 891 unique problems, were identified for the group of 22,248 patients. Medical services claims contributed to the majority of problems identified (77\%), followed by therapeutic indications from electronic prescriptions (14\%), and single-indication drugs (9\%). Physicians actively chose to assess 41.7\% (n = 106,950) of health problems. Overall, 73\% of the problems assessed were considered valid; 42\% originated from medical service diagnostic codes, 11\% from single indication drugs, and 47\% from prescription indications. Twelve percent of problems identified through other treating physicians were considered valid compared to 28\% identified through study physician claims. CONCLUSION: Automation of an inter-institutional problem list added over half of all validated problems to the health problem list of which 12\% were generated by conditions treated by other physicians. Automating the integration of existing information sources provides timely access to accurate and relevant health problem information. It may also accelerate the uptake and use of electronic medical record systems.
This article was published in BMC Med Inform Decis Mak and referenced in Internal Medicine: Open Access

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version