alexa Assessment of medication management by community-living elderly persons with two standardized assessment tools: a cross-sectional study.
Neurology

Neurology

Journal of Alzheimers Disease & Parkinsonism

Author(s): Hutchison LC, Jones SK, West DS, Wei JY

Abstract Share this page

Abstract BACKGROUND: The ability of patients to adhere to a medication regimen is imperative for achieving optimal outcomes. Elderly patients, especially those with memory loss, should be evaluated for their ability to manage medications to prevent significant drug-related problems. Assessment tools to determine the ability to manage medication therapy have not been tested in elderly patients with cognitive impairment. OBJECTIVES: This study compared the Medication Management Ability Assessment (M1V1AA) and the Drug Regimen Unassisted Grading Scale (DRUGS) as standardized tools to assess medication management skills in elderly patients with a range of cognitive function and evaluated the association between the results obtained from these scales and self-reported drug-related problems. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of older individuals living in the community. At a scheduled study visit, the research assistant (RA) questioned participants with a structured interview to document demographic information, medical history, prescription use, over-the-counter drug and dietary supplement use, health care resource use, medication management practices, and adverse drug events. Cognitive status was assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and functional status with the instrumental activities of daily living rating scale. The MMAA, which uses a fictitious medication regimen with labeled prescription bottles, and the DRUGS, which uses the patient's own prescription bottles, were administered. Three months after the visit, the RA telephoned participants to determine recent changes in living situation and drug-related problems. RESULTS: The study group comprised 52 people with a mean (SD) MMSE score of 28.3 (2.5). The participants had a mean (SD) age of 75.8 (6.2) years; 69\% (36/52) were women, and 96\% (50/52) were white. Participants reported an average of 4.1 medical conditions, and 88\% (46/52) reported good to excellent health. Skipping doses or cutting them in half was reported by 25\% (13/52) of participants who adjusted doses themselves. Almost half (44\%) reported medication problems and/or medication ineffectiveness during the past 3 months at both the study visit and the 3-month follow-up (23/52 for both). The 49 participants who took the MMAA had a mean (SD) score of 19.4 (6.1), with a range of 0 to 25. Of the 49 participants with scores, 34 took less than the correct number of tablets and 13 took more. The 46 participants who took the DRUGS had a mean (SD) score of 91.6 (24.7), with a range of 0 to 100. Forty of 46 participants attempting the test attained the maximum score. Higher scores for both tests indicate better accuracy. Analysis revealed that the MMAA and the DRUGS correlated with one another (P = 0.000). We found no significant associations between these medication management assessment tools and selfreported adherence or drug-related events. CONCLUSIONS: The MMAA and DRUGS tools correlated positively with cognitive function in this population of community-living elderly persons but need further evaluation of their ability to predict who is at greatest risk for drug related problems due to nonadherence to medication regimens. This article was published in Am J Geriatr Pharmacother and referenced in Journal of Alzheimers Disease & Parkinsonism

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords