alexa Attitudes of anaesthetists and surgeons to informed consent: 1AP3-8.
Anesthesiology

Anesthesiology

Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research

Author(s): AAB Jamjoom, Hardman J G, Moppett I K

Abstract Share this page

Background and Goal of Study: The attitudes of patients' to informed consent have changed over the years1, but there has been little systematic study of the attitudes (and possible differences) of anaesthetists and surgeons in this process. We aimed to describe the attitudes of medical professionals in our local hospital to issues surrounding informed consent.

Materials and Methods: A custom designed questionnaire was administered to a randomly selected cohort of 75 anaesthetists and surgeons. All answers were selected from a 5‐point scale: 1 ‐ strongly disagree to 5 ‐ strongly agree.

Results and Discussions: Surgeons and anaesthetists generally agreed in their attitudes towards informed consent. Although the clear majority were happy with the provision of informed consent in their practice, less than 25% had had formal training. Respondents were more inclined towards consent as an ethical and legal obligation than being of benefit to the doctor‐patient relationship; anaesthetists were more likely to feel that informed consent may reduce anxiety. Around 50% of both groups felt that informed consent was inappropriate since most patients do not usually remember all the information given to them. Although, in the UK consent can be taken by any appropriately trained person, both groups were strongly opposed to non‐physician consent, anaesthetists more so. The majority of both groups felt that major risks more common that 1:1000 should be disclosed; a minority felt this for risks > 1:10,000. For minor risks, the majority favoured disclosure > 1:100, the minority for risk > 1:1000. UK case law does not set a particular frequency of risk for disclosure. The level of the patient's education, inquisitiveness and seriousness of co‐morbidity were more likely to influence anaesthetists than surgeons. Neither group was particularly influenced by patient's sex or publicly versus privately funded healthcare settings. Both groups favoured the provision of written information.

Conclusion: Surgeons and anaesthetists in the UK have similar attitudes to informed consent, though anaesthetists may be more influenced by individual circumstances than surgeons. Both groups tend towards informed consent as an obligation rather than being of benefit to the patient.

  • To read the full article Visit
  • Open Access
This article was published in BMC Med Ethics and referenced in Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords