Author(s): Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R
Abstract Share this page
Abstract This review provides a survey on the longevity of restorations in stress-bearing posterior cavities and assesses possible reasons for clinical failure. The dental literature, predominantly since 1990, was reviewed for longitudinal, controlled clinical studies and retrospective cross-sectional studies of posterior restorations. Only studies investigating the clinical performance of restorations in permanent teeth were included. Longevity and annual failure rates of amalgam, direct composite restorations, compomers, glass ionomers and derivative products, composite and ceramic inlays and cast gold restorations were determined for Class I and II cavities. Mean (SD) annual failure rates in posterior stress-bearing cavities are: 3.0\% (1.9) for amalgam restorations, 2.2\% (2.0) for direct composites, 3.6\% (4.2) for direct composites with inserts, 1.1\% (1.2) for compomer restorations, 7.2\% (5.6) for regular glass ionomer restorations, 7.1\% (2.8) for tunnel glass ionomers, 6.0\% (4.6) for ART glass ionomers, 2.9\% (2.6) for composite inlays, 1.9\% (1.8) for ceramic restorations, 1.7\% (1.6) for CAD/CAM ceramic restorations and 1.4\% (1.4) for cast gold inlays and onlays. Publications from 1990 forward showed better results. Indirect restorations exhibited a significantly lower mean annual failure rate than direct techniques (p=0.0031). Longevity of dental restorations is dependent upon many different factors, including material, patient- and dentist-related. Principal reasons for failure were secondary caries, fracture, marginal deficiencies, wear and postoperative sensitivity. We need to learn to distinguish between reasons that cause early failures and those that are responsible for restoration loss after several years of service.
This article was published in Oper Dent
and referenced in Dentistry