Author(s): Naik R, Tabana H, Doherty T, Zembe W, Jackson D
Abstract Share this page
Abstract BACKGROUND: HIV counselling and testing (HCT) is a critical gateway for addressing HIV prevention and linking people to treatment, care, and support. Since national testing rates are often less than optimal, there is growing interest in expanding testing coverage through the implementation of innovative models such as home-based HIV counselling and testing (HBHCT). With the aim of informing scale up, this paper discusses client characteristics and acceptability of an HBHCT intervention implemented in rural South Africa. METHODS: Trained lay counsellors offered door-to-door rapid HIV testing in a rural sub-district of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Household and client data were captured on cellular phones and transmitted to a web-based data management system. Descriptive analysis was undertaken to examine client characteristics, testing history, HBHCT uptake, and reasons for refusal. Chi-square tests were performed to assess the association between client characteristics and uptake. RESULTS: Lay counsellors visited 3,328 households and tested 75\% (5,086) of the 6,757 people met. The majority of testers (73.7\%) were female, and 57\% had never previously tested. With regard to marital status, 1,916 (37.7\%), 2,123 (41.7\%), and 818 (16.1\%) were single, married, and widowed, respectively. Testers ranged in age from 14 to 98 years, with a median of 37 years. Two hundred and twenty-nine couples received couples counselling and testing; 87.8\%, 4.8\%, and 7.4\% were concordant negative, concordant positive, and discordant, respectively. There were significant differences in characteristics between testers and non-testers as well as between male and female testers. The most common reasons for not testing were: not being ready/feeling scared/needing to think about it (34.1\%); knowing his/her status (22.6\%), being HIV-positive (18.5\%), and not feeling at risk of having or acquiring HIV (10.1\%). The distribution of reasons for refusal differed significantly by gender and age. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that HBHCT is acceptable in rural South Africa. However, future HBHCT programmes should carefully consider community context, develop strategies to reach a broad range of clients, and tailor intervention messages and services to meet the unique needs of different sub-groups. It will also be important to understand and address factors related to refusal of testing.
This article was published in BMC Public Health
and referenced in Journal of Infectious Diseases & Therapy