alexa Cognitive testing with the Post-Operative Quality of Recovery Scale in pre-surgery cancer patients--a controlled study.
Nursing

Nursing

Journal of Perioperative & Critical Intensive Care Nursing

Author(s): Lindqvist M, Granstrom A, Schening A, Bjorne H, Jakobsson JG

Abstract Share this page

Abstract BACKGROUND: Post-Operative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS) has been revised to allow for the normal variation in cognitive performance seen in healthy volunteers. This modification could result in exclusion of test subjects because of poor baseline performance. Our aim was to investigate the impact of severe disease and waiting for cancer surgery on PQRS baseline cognitive performance and exclusion rate, and also on variation in cognitive performance at test re-test. METHODS: Sixty-one subjects, 31 women diagnosed with breast cancer and waiting for surgery and 30 healthy women, performed the PQRS cognitive, nociceptive and emotional domains three times in 48 h. Exclusion rate, change in score and the proportion fulfilling 'recovery' criteria at re-tests were assessed. RESULTS: Nine out of 31 patients (29\%) and two out of 30 controls (7\%) had too low baseline score to be further assessed (P = 0.043). The change in score at re-tests was similar between the groups. Sixty-four per cent and 83\% at 20 h and 79\% and 86\% at 48 h in the patient and control groups respectively fulfilled the 'recovery' criteria (P = 0.45). The 'recovery' for nociceptive and emotional distress was similar between the groups, but anxiety and sadness absolute scores were significantly higher in the patient group. CONCLUSION: Women with breast cancer waiting for surgery expressed a higher level of emotional distress, performed lower at baseline but showed no difference in test re-test variability in cognitive performance according to the PQRS when compared with controls. The considerable exclusion rate among patients waiting for cancer surgery should be acknowledged. © 2015 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This article was published in Acta Anaesthesiol Scand and referenced in Journal of Perioperative & Critical Intensive Care Nursing

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri & Aquaculture Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9040

Clinical Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Food & Nutrition Journals

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics & Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Materials Science Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Nursing & Health Care Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

Ann Jose

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

 
© 2008- 2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords