alexa Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4\% articaine and 2\% lidocaine for maxillary buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
Medicine

Medicine

Emergency Medicine: Open Access

Author(s): Srinivasan N, Kavitha M, Loganathan CS, Padmini G

Abstract Share this page

Abstract OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to compare the anesthetic efficacy of 4\% articaine and 2\% lidocaine (both with 1:100,000 epinephrine) for buccal infiltration in patients experiencing irreversible pulpitis in maxillary posterior teeth. STUDY DESIGN: Forty patients with irreversible pulpitis in first premolar or first molar were divided into 4 study groups and received buccal infiltration of either 4\% articaine or 2\% lidocaine in a double-blind manner. Endodontic access was begun 5 minutes after solution deposition. Success was defined as no or mild discomfort (VAS recordings) during the endodontic procedure. RESULTS: The success rate for maxillary buccal infiltration to produce pulpal anesthesia using articaine was 100\% in first premolar and first molar, and for the lidocaine solution, success rate was 80\% in first premolar and 30\% in first molar. There was high significant difference between the articaine and lidocaine solutions (ANOVA; P < .001). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of 4\% articaine was superior to 2\% lidocaine for maxillary buccal infiltration in posterior teeth. This article was published in Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod and referenced in Emergency Medicine: Open Access

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords