alexa Comparison of methods for the identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci.


Journal of Womens Health Care

Author(s): Cunha Mde L, Sinzato YK, Silveira LV

Abstract Share this page

Abstract Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) species identification is still difficult for most clinical laboratories. The scheme proposed by Kloos and Schleifer and modified by Bannerman is the reference method used for the identification of staphylococcal species and subspecies; however, this method is relatively laborious for routine use since it requires the utilization of a large number of biochemical tests. The objective of the present study was to compare four methods, i.e., the reference method, the API Staph system (bioMérieux) and two methods modified from the reference method in our laboratory (simplified method and disk method), in the identification of 100 CNS strains. Compared to the reference method, the simplified method and disk method correctly identified 100 and 99\% of the CNS species, respectively, while this rate was 84\% for the API Staph system. Inaccurate identification by the API Staph method was observed for Staphylococcus epidermidis (2.2\%), S. hominis (25\%), S. haemolyticus (37.5\%), and S. warneri (47.1\%). The simplified method using the simple identification scheme proposed in the present study was found to be efficient for all strains tested, with 100\% sensitivity and specificity and proved to be available alternative for the identification of staphylococci, offering, higher reliability and lower cost than the currently available commercial systems. This method would be very useful in clinical microbiology laboratory, especially in places with limited resources. This article was published in Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz and referenced in Journal of Womens Health Care

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version