alexa Comparison of saccadic eye movements in humans and macaques to single-step and double-step target movements.
Biomedical Sciences

Biomedical Sciences

Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Devices

Author(s): Baizer JS, Bender DB

Abstract Share this page

Abstract Human and monkey saccade amplitude and latency, in response to 12-36 degrees target steps, differed substantially despite nearly identical experimental conditions. On single-step trials, monkeys did not undershoot targets, and latencies were insensitive to stimulus and contextual factors. Human saccades did undershoot, their latency was longer, and both undershoot and latency were affected by stimulus variables and experimental context. On double-step trials, the second target step altered primary saccade amplitude when the step occurred as little as 40 msec prior to saccade onset for both humans and monkeys. However, humans and monkeys showed somewhat different amplitude transition functions, and monkeys showed little evidence of parallel programming.
This article was published in Vision Res and referenced in Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Devices

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords