alexa Complication rates of tube thoracostomy.


Journal of Pulmonary & Respiratory Medicine

Author(s): Chan L, Reilly KM, Henderson C, Kahn F, Salluzzo RF

Abstract Share this page

Abstract This study compared the complication rates of tube thoracostomy performed in the emergency department (ED) versus the operating room (OR) and the inpatient ward (IW). A retrospective case series of all patients at an urban, university-based level 1 trauma center hospital who received tube thoracostomy for any indication between 1/1/93 and 12/31/93 was conducted. Complications were defined as empyema, unresolved pneumothorax (persistent air leak or residual pneumothorax), persistent effusion, or incorrect placement. The data for age and duration of tube placement were weighted for analysis of variance (ANOVA). A total of 352 tube thoracostomies was placed in 239 patients. Twenty-three patients had three or more chest tubes placed, 65 had two placed, and the remaining 181 had a single tube. Ninety-nine tubes were placed in the ED, 87 in the OR, and 166 on IW. The mean age of patients in the ED was 37 years, and differed significantly (P < .015) from those in the OR (48 years) and the IW (44 years). The duration of tube placement was similar for all groups (mean = 6.5 days). The overall complication rates related to tube insertion were: ED, 14.0\%; OR, 9.2\%; IW, 25.3\%. Significance was achieved when comparing complication rates between the ED and IW, with less complications in the ED (P = .0436). When comparing complication rates between the ED and OR, there was no significant difference (P = .3643). A power calculation indicated too small of a sample size to truly determine an insignificant difference between complication rates between the ED and OR. Placement of emergent thoracostomy tubes in the ED does not result in an increased complication rate as compared to placement in the IW.
This article was published in Am J Emerg Med and referenced in Journal of Pulmonary & Respiratory Medicine

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals


1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version