alexa Computed tomographic analysis of outer calvarial thickness for osseointegrated bone-anchored hearing system insertion.


Anatomy & Physiology: Current Research

Author(s): Novakovic D, Meller CJ, Makeham JM, Brazier DH, Forer M,

Abstract Share this page

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Osseointegrated bone-anchored hearing systems (BAHSs) are a useful tool in auditory rehabilitation for single-sided deafness and conductive/mixed hearing loss. They rely on adequate osseointegration of titanium implants, which can be limited by calvarial thickness. This study examines adult computed tomographic (CT) temporal bone normative data for calvarial thickness in the areas commonly recommended for BAHS insertion and identifies hazards that may compromise the osseointegration process. METHODS: Prospective analysis of 100 consecutive adult helical CT scans. Calvarial thickness was measured in axial and coronal planes 5.5 cm posterior to the superior external auditory canal at 6 vertical points (EAC, +1 cm, +2 cm, +3 cm, +4 cm, and +5 cm). Other parameters measured include temporal bone pneumatization and the presence of suture lines, bone marrow, and vascular structures. RESULTS: A total of 195 temporal bones were examined in 100 patients. Mean patient age was 60.9 years, of whom 54.4\% were men and 45.6\% were women. Mean calvarial thickness was greatest at +1 cm above the EAC level (6.3 mm) and thinnest at +4 cm (5.1 mm). Of temporal bones, 55\% had at least 1 site thinner than 4 mm and 21\% had at least 1 site thinner than 3 mm. Air cells and suture lines were more likely to be encountered within 2 cm above the EAC level, and marrow space is more likely to be encountered 3 to 4 cm above the EAC level. DISCUSSION: Selecting a position 3 to 4 cm above the level of the EAC is more likely to result in dural exposure for a 3-mm BAHS abutment, especially in men. Selecting a position near the level of the EAC provides thicker bone, but the surgeon is more likely to encounter suture line or enter mastoid air cells. Preoperative CT imaging may be a useful tool in evaluating calvarial thickness and hazards when planning BAHS insertion in the adult population. © 2011, Otology & Neurotology, Inc. This article was published in Otol Neurotol and referenced in Anatomy & Physiology: Current Research

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

  • Seema Narayan
    A comparative study of the link between real exchange rate of ASEAN countries and fossil fuel prices
    PDF Version
  • Navinchandra G. Ashar
    Comparative study of techno-economic evaluation of the production of liquid Sulphur Di Oxide
    PDF Version
  • Wei Gong
    Wei Gong-Huazhong-University-of-Science-and-Technology-China-Probabilistic-seismic-hazard-assessment-for-the-pseudo-negative-stiffness-control-of- a-steel-base-isolated-building-A-comparative-study-
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Abdullah Altin
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Nahla A El-Wakil
    Comparative study of enzymatic and chemical denaturation of wheat gluten and their cellulosic nanocomposites
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Krzysztof Wieczerzak
    A comparative transcriptome provides candidate genes for determination the cause of males infertility.
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Flavia Secco Tavares de Souza
    A Comparative Study Among Elective Conventional Surgery, Urgency/Emergency Conventional Approaching and Elective Videolaparoscopic Surgery on the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients at First Surgeric Clinic of Federal Hospital of Bonsucesso with a Diagnostic of Colorectal adenocarcinoma, between January 2010 and December 2012
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Rajendra K Ray
    Comparative Study And Improvement Of Shallow-Water Models
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Nisreen E. Mahmoud
    Parasitological and comparative pathological studies on monogenean infestation of cultured sea bream (Sparus aurata, Sparidae) in Egypt.
    PPT Version | PDF Version

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version