Author(s): Bauer TT, Ewig S, Marre R, Suttorp N, Welte T CAPNETZ Study
Abstract Share this page
Abstract OBJECTIVE: The study was performed to validate the CURB, CRB and CRB-65 scores for the prediction of death from community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in both the hospital and out-patient setting. DESIGN: Data were derived from a large multi-centre prospective study initiated by the German competence network for community-acquired pneumonia (CAPNETZ) which started in March 2003 and were censored for this analysis in October 2004. SETTING: Out- and in-hospital patients in 670 private practices and 10 clinical centres. SUBJECTS: Analysis was done for n = 1343 patients (n = 208 out-patients and n = 1135 hospitalized) with all data sets completed for the calculation of CURB and repeated for n = 1967 patients (n = 482 out-patients and n = 1485 hospitalized) with complete data sets for CRB and CRB-65. INTERVENTION: None. 30-day mortality from CAP was determined by personal contacts or a structured interview. RESULTS: Overall 30-day mortality was 4.3\% (0.6\% in out-patients and 5.5\% in hospitalized patients, P < 0.0001). Overall, the CURB, CRB and CRB-65 scores provided comparable predictions for death from CAP as determined by receiver-operator-characteristics (ROC) curves. However, in hospitalized patients, CRB misclassified 26\% of deaths as low risk patients. Availability of the CRB-65 score (90\%) was far superior to that of CURB (65\%), due to missing blood urea nitrogen values (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both the CURB and CRB-65 scores can be used in the hospital and out-patients setting to assess pneumonia severity and the risk of death. Given that the CRB-65 is easier to handle, we favour the use of CRB-65 where blood urea nitrogen is unavailable.
This article was published in J Intern Med
and referenced in Journal of Pulmonary & Respiratory Medicine