alexa Degree of variation and reproducibility of different methods for the diagnosis of subclinical endometritis.
Reproductive Medicine

Reproductive Medicine

Journal of Fertilization: In Vitro - IVF-Worldwide, Reproductive Medicine, Genetics & Stem Cell Biology

Author(s): Melcher Y, Prunner I, Drillich M

Abstract Share this page

Abstract Endometrial cytology as a reliable diagnostic technique has been established for the diagnosis of subclinical endometritis (SE) in cows. Several counting techniques have been used to determine polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) in endometrial samples. Information on the agreement between different techniques, however, is limited. Therefore, the objective of this study was to analyze the degree of variation in the percentage of endometrial cells and PMN determined by six different counting techniques. A second objective was to evaluate the interobserver reproducibility of the cell counting by two different examiners. One hundred samples were examined by the different counting techniques. The applied methods counted a total of 100, 300, or 500 cells (C100, C300, C500), respectively. In addition, method HPF100 and HPF300 counted 100 and 300 cells in 10 high-power fields per slide. Finally, one method estimated (EST) the percentage of PMN by screening the slide under the microscope. The interobserver reproducibility between two examiners was analyzed for method C300. The comparison between the six different methods showed a strong compliance (r = 0.77-0.90) with greatest correlation coefficient between C100 and C300. The results of Kappa statistics revealed agreement between methods varying from ĸ = 0.30-0.85, with the greatest agreement between HPF300 and EST. Furthermore, the impact of the different methods on the resulting prevalence of SE was calculated, with the greatest prevalence determined by C100 (33.0\%) and the least by HPF300 (10.0\%). The results of the interobserver reproducibility showed good correlation and agreement (r = 0.86, ĸ = 0.79). In conclusion, all examined methods were suitable for the cytological evaluation of PMN, with method C100 showing lowest agreement with the other methods. This confirms the hypothesis that a suitable threshold for PMN is not only influenced by, for example, time of sampling postpartum, but also by the diagnostic method. A threshold of 5\% PMN seems to be useful when C300 and HPF100 are used, whereas counting 100 cells or estimating the percentage of PMN seems to overestimate or underestimate the prevalence of SE, respectively. In conclusion, method C300 and HPF100 can be recommended as methods of choice for evaluating the percentage of PMN in endometrial samples to diagnose SE. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This article was published in Theriogenology and referenced in Journal of Fertilization: In Vitro - IVF-Worldwide, Reproductive Medicine, Genetics & Stem Cell Biology

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

agrifoodaquavet@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

clinical_biochem@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

business@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

chemicaleng_chemistry@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

environmentalsci@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

engineering@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

generalsci_healthcare@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

genetics_molbio@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

immuno_microbio@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

omics@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

materialsci@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

mathematics_physics@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

medical@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

neuro_psychology@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

pharma@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

social_politicalsci@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version