alexa Diagnostic accuracy of clinical assessment, magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography, and intra-articular injection in hip arthroscopy patients.
Physicaltherapy & Rehabilitation

Physicaltherapy & Rehabilitation

Journal of Novel Physiotherapies

Author(s): Byrd JW, Jones KS

Abstract Share this page

Abstract BACKGROUND: Hip arthroscopy has defined elusive causes of hip pain. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: It is postulated that the reliability of various investigative methods is inconsistent. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of these methods. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. METHODS: Five parameters were assessed in 40 patients: clinical assessment, high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium arthrography, intra-articular bupivacaine injection, and arthroscopy. Using arthroscopy as the definitive diagnosis, the other parameters were evaluated for reliability. RESULTS: Hip abnormality was clinically suspected in all cases with 98\% accuracy (1 false positive). However, the nature of the abnormality was identified in only 13 cases with 92\% accuracy. Magnetic resonance imaging variously demonstrated direct or indirect evidence of abnormality but overall demonstrated a 42\% false-negative and a 10\% false-positive interpretation. Magnetic resonance arthrography demonstrated an 8\% false-negative and 20\% false-positive interpretation. Response to the intra-articular injection of anesthetic was 90\% accurate (3 false-negative and 1 false-positive responses) for detecting the presence of intra-articular abnormality. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, clinical assessment accurately determined the existence of intra-articular abnormality but was poor at defining its nature. Magnetic resonance arthrography was much more sensitive than magnetic resonance imaging at detecting various lesions but had twice as many false-positive interpretations. Response to an intra-articular injection of anesthetic was a 90\% reliable indicator of intra-articular abnormality.
This article was published in Am J Sports Med and referenced in Journal of Novel Physiotherapies

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version