alexa Ephedrine requirements are reduced during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section in preeclampsia.


Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research

Author(s): Clark VA, SharwoodSmith GH, Stewart AV

Abstract Share this page

Abstract BACKGROUND: Despite controversy over the haemodynamically safest blockade for caesarean section in women with severe preeclampsia, an increasing number of anaesthetists now opt for spinal anaesthesia. In a previous study we found that spinal compared to epidural anaesthesia offered an equally safe but more effective option for these patients. The current study was designed to compare the hypotension induced by spinal anaesthesia, as measured by ephedrine requirement, between 20 normotensive and 20 severely preeclamptic but haemodynamically stabilised women. METHOD: Standardised spinal anaesthesia was instituted and ephedrine was given in boluses of 6 mg if the systolic pressure fell >20\% from the baseline, or if the patient exhibited symptoms of hypotension. RESULTS: The mean ephedrine requirement of the normotensive group (27.9+/-11.6 mg) was significantly greater (P<0.01) than that of the preeclamptic group (16.4+/-15.0 mg). CONCLUSION: This suggests that the hypotension induced by spinal anaesthesia in women with severe but haemodynamically stabilised preeclampsia, is less than that of normotensive patients. This article was published in Int J Obstet Anesth and referenced in Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version