alexa Errors Associated with a Systematic Sampling Creel Census
Agri and Aquaculture

Agri and Aquaculture

Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal

Author(s): Merle W Johnson

Abstract Share this page

An analysis of errors associated with creel census estimates obtained by systematic sampling is presented. The sample census method makes use of instantaneous boat counts at regular intervals, and provides a sample of about 24 percent of the fishing hours. To evaluate the census method, samples representing two census patterns were extracted from complete creel census data from Many Point Lake, a 1,716-acre walleye lake. Sampling errors at the 95-percent level for a 142-day summer census were about ± 13 percent for estimated man-hours; ± 17 percent for estimated man-trips; ± 17 percent for numbers of fish by species; and ± 19 percent for pounds of fish by species. Methods for calculating creel census error are presented and discussed. The largest component of error was associated with estimates of boat-hours. Catch per boat-trip also showed considerable error. Computation of estimates and error was greatly facilitated by calculating from a season-long sample rather than by using summary calculations for shorter intervals. An even distribution of census days throughout the week appears preferable to separate consideration of weekdays and week-end days with greater census effort on the latter.

This article was published in Transactions of the American Fisheries Society and referenced in Fisheries and Aquaculture Journal

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version