alexa Expectant, medical, or surgical management of first-trimester miscarriage: a meta-analysis.


Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy

Author(s): Sotiriadis A, Makrydimas G, Papatheodorou S, Ioannidis JP

Abstract Share this page

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To quantify the relative benefits and harms of different management options for first-trimester miscarriage. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register searches (1966 to July 2004), including references of retrieved articles. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Randomized trials assigning women with first-trimester missed or incomplete miscarriage to surgical, medical, or expectant management were included. Primary outcomes were successful treatment and patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included moderate or severe bleeding, blood transfusion, emergency curettage, pelvic inflammatory disease, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Comparisons used the risk difference. Between-study heterogeneity and random effects summary estimates were calculated. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Complete evacuation of the uterus was significantly more common with surgical than medical management (risk difference 32.8\%, number needed to treat 3, success rate of medical management 62\%) and with medical than expectant management (risk difference 49.7\%, number needed to treat 2). Success rate with expectant management was spuriously low (39\%) in the latter comparison. Analysis of cases with incomplete miscarriage only showed that medical management still had two thirds the chance to induce complete evacuation compared with surgical management, but it was better than expectant management. Data from studies that evaluated outcome at 48 hours or more after allocation indicated again that medical management had a better success rate than expectant management but a worse success rate than surgical management; expectant management probably had much lower success rates than surgical evacuation, but data were very sparse. Patient satisfaction data were sparse. Moderate or severe bleeding was less common with medical than expectant management (risk difference 3.2\%) and possibly surgical management (risk difference 2.1\%). There was a considerable amount of missing information, in particular for secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: One additional success can be achieved among 3 women treated surgically rather than medically. Expectant management has had remarkably variable success rates across these studies, depending probably on the type of miscarriage. Greater standardization of outcomes should be a goal of future research. This article was published in Obstet Gynecol and referenced in Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version