Author(s): Natsuaki M, Kozuma K, Morimoto T, Kadota K, Muramatsu T,
Abstract Share this page
Abstract BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data reporting the clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent (BP-BES) compared with durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (DP-EES) beyond 1 year after stent implantation when the polymer is fully degraded. METHODS AND RESULTS: The NOBORI Biolimus-Eluting Versus XIENCE/PROMUS Everolimus-Eluting Stent Trial (NEXT) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial comparing BP-BES with DP-EES in patients scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stent (DES) without any exclusion criteria among 98 participating centers in Japan. The trial was designed to evaluate noninferiority of BP-BES relative to DP-EES in terms of any target-lesion revascularization at 1 year and death or myocardial infarction at 3 years. Between May and October 2011, 3235 patients were randomly assigned to receive either BP-BES (1617 patients) or DP-EES (1618 patients). Complete 3-year follow-up was achieved in 97.6\% of patients. At 3 years, the primary safety end point of death or myocardial infarction occurred in 159 patients (9.9\%) in the BP-BES group and in 166 patients (10.3\%) in the DP-EES group, demonstrating noninferiority of BP-BES relative to DP-EES (P noninferiority<0.0001 and P superiority=0.7). Cumulative incidence of target-lesion revascularization was not significantly different between the 2 groups (7.4\% versus 7.1\%; P=0.8). By a landmark analysis at 1 year, the cumulative incidences of death or myocardial infarction and target-lesion revascularization were also not significantly different between the 2 groups (4.6\% versus 5.2\%; P=0.46 and 3.3\% versus 2.7\%; P=0.39, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Safety and efficacy outcomes of BP-BES were non inferior to those of DP-EES 3 years after stent implantation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01303640. © 2015 American Heart Association, Inc.
This article was published in Circ Cardiovasc Interv
and referenced in Angiology: Open Access