Author(s): AshayeriPanah M, Eftekhar F, Ghamsari MM, Parvin M, Feizabadi MM
Abstract Share this page
Abstract In this study, the discriminatory power of pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) methods for subtyping of 54 clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae were compared. All isolates were typeable by RAPD, while 3.6\% of them were not typeable by PFGE. The repeatability of both typing methods were 100\% with satisfying reproducibility (≥ 95\%). Although the discriminatory power of PFGE was greater than RAPD, both methods showed sufficient discriminatory power (DI > 0.95) which reflects the heterogeneity among the K. pneumoniae isolates. An optimized RAPD protocol is less technically demanding and time consuming that makes it a reliable typing method and competitive with PFGE.
This article was published in Braz J Microbiol
and referenced in Journal of Food Processing & Technology