alexa Greenhouse Gas Benefits of a Biogas Plant in Austria.
Engineering

Engineering

Research & Reviews: Journal of Engineering and Technology

Author(s): Susanne WoessGallasch, Neil Bird, Peter Enzinger, Gerfried Jungmeier, Reinhard Padinger, Naomi Pena, Giuliana Zanchi

Abstract Share this page

The goal of this study is to quantify the greenhouse gas (GHG) and energy impacts of a biogas plant with closed storage of digested materials. The plant of „NegH Biostrom KEG“ in Paldau in the state of Styria, Austria, was analysed. Results are based on measurements of methane produced in the closed storage tank and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Feedstocks for the biogas plant are primarily crops and secondarily animal manure. The plant has two main digesters and two secondary digesters in addition to the closed storage tank for digested biomass. Methane produced in the digesters and storage tank are used to produce approximately 4 GWh electric energy and 7 GWh heat per year. Only 17 % of heat produced is currently used. Total Biogas production and methane concentration from the closed storage was measured during the period May – October 2006. Based on these measurements, an annual production of 15.6 tons of CH4 per year was estimated assuming tank cleanings were done without opening the tank, which represents best practice operation. Using these results, a theoretical case was constructed of a biogas plant using the same feedstocks but storing digested biomass in an open tank. It was assumed that open storage would result in methane emissions to the atmosphere equal to those produced in the closed storage tank. A comparison of these two cases shows the increased energy production and GHG emissions avoided by using closed storage. The LCA analysis covered carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions due to construction, operation and dismantling of the energy systems; and the cultivation (including fertilizer use and land use change), harvest and transport of biomass raw materials as well as use of by-products. GHG impacts of the two biogas plants were compared to a reference system (reference system I) which delivered equivalent amounts electricity and heat. In the reference system, electricity is assumed to come from a natural gas plant, and heat from a combination of oil and wood, which was the case prior to operation of the Paldau biogas plant. The results show that: • Open storage results in total LCA GHG emissions 29 % higher than closed storage. • Due to increased CH4 production and higher CH4 concentration in the biogas coming from closed storage, open storage produces 1.9 % less energy than closed storage. • Closed storage plant results in 1,409 tons of CO2-eq per year, which is 1,094 tons or 44 % less GHG emissions than the reference system. Open storage reduces emission by 685 tons per year, or 27 %. • This equates to emissions savings of 292 kg CO2-eq per t dry biomass for the closed storage system and 183 kg for the open storage. Direct land use changes (onsite) sequester 48 tons of CO2 per year, reducing total GHG emissions in the Paldau plant by 3.4 %. A sensitivity analysis showed that if even relatively small amounts of CH4 (e.g. 5 %) escape from the storage tanks or digesters, the GHG benefits of biogas plants are substantially reduced. If all heat produced by the biogas plant Paldau can be used, GHG emission benefits increase significantly.

  • To read the full article Visit
  • Open Access
This article was published in IEA Bioenergy Task. and referenced in Research & Reviews: Journal of Engineering and Technology

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

agrifoodaquavet@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

clinical_biochem@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

business@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

chemicaleng_chemistry@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

environmentalsci@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

engineering@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

generalsci_healthcare@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

genetics_molbio@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

immuno_microbio@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

omics@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

materialsci@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

mathematics_physics@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

medical@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

neuro_psychology@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

pharma@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

social_politicalsci@omicsonline.com

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords