Author(s): Colom F, Vieta E, Tacchi MJ, SnchezMoreno J, Scott J
Abstract Share this page
Abstract OBJECTIVES: To review the definition of non-adherence, its clinical and economic impact and identify its role and impact in clinical practice. METHODS: A selective review of the literature as conducted of articles and literature known to the authors. RESULTS: There is a paucity of studies examining specifically treatment non-adherence and its consequences in bipolar disorder. Few studies have systematically examined ways in which treatment adherence can impact treatment and improve outcome. CONCLUSION: Non-adherence is common in the management of bipolar disorder. Clinicians and Researchers alike need to remain alert and be aware of issues related to non-adherence--in particular suicide. Like other course-modifiers non-adherence has to be considered, sought and addressed, and this is perhaps best done by including psychoeducation in routine clinical care.
This article was published in Bipolar Disord
and referenced in Journal of Psychiatry