alexa Lifetime prevalence of psychotic and bipolar I disorders in a general population.
Psychiatry

Psychiatry

Journal of Psychiatry

Author(s): Perl J, Suvisaari J, Saarni SI, Kuoppasalmi K, Isomets E, , Perl J, Suvisaari J, Saarni SI, Kuoppasalmi K, Isomets E,

Abstract Share this page

Abstract CONTEXT: Recent general population surveys of psychotic disorders have found low lifetime prevalences. However, this may be owing to methodological problems. Few studies have reported the prevalences of all specific psychotic disorders. OBJECTIVE: To provide reliable estimates of the lifetime prevalences of specific psychotic disorders. DESIGN: General population survey. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A nationally representative sample of 8028 persons 30 years or older was screened for psychotic and bipolar I disorders using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, self-reported diagnoses, medical examination, and national registers. Those selected by the screens were then re-interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. Best-estimate DSM-IV diagnoses were formed by combining the interview and case note data. Register diagnoses were used to estimate the effect of the nonresponders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Diagnosis of any psychotic or bipolar I disorder according to the DSM-IV criteria. RESULTS: The lifetime prevalence of all psychotic disorders was 3.06\% and rose to 3.48\% when register diagnoses of the nonresponder group were included. Lifetime prevalences were as follows: 0.87\% for schizophrenia, 0.32\% for schizoaffective disorder, 0.07\% for schizophreniform disorder, 0.18\% for delusional disorder, 0.24\% for bipolar I disorder, 0.35\% for major depressive disorder with psychotic features, 0.42\% for substance-induced psychotic disorders, and 0.21\% for psychotic disorders due to a general medical condition. The National Hospital Discharge Register was the most reliable of the screens (kappa = 0.80). Case notes supplementing the interviews were essential for specific diagnoses of psychotic disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple sources of information are essential for accurate estimation of lifetime prevalences of psychotic disorders. The use of comprehensive methods reveals that their lifetime prevalence exceeds 3\%. This article was published in Arch Gen Psychiatry and referenced in Journal of Psychiatry

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords