Author(s): Case RB, Moss AJ, Case N, McDermott M, Eberly S
Abstract Share this page
Abstract OBJECTIVE: To determine if the presence of a disrupted marriage or living alone would be an independent prognostic risk factor for a subsequent major cardiac event following an initial myocardial infarction. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation in the placebo wing of a randomized, double-blind drug trial in patients with an enzyme-documented acute myocardial infarction who were admitted to a coronary care facility. Data for living alone and/or a marital disruption were entered into a Cox proportional hazards model constructed from important physiologic and nonphysiologic factors in the same database. SETTING: Multicenter trial in a mixture of community and academic hospitals in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: All consenting patients who were 25 to 75 years of age and without other serious diseases were enrolled (placebo, N = 1234) within 3 to 15 days of the index infarction and followed for a period of 1 to 4 years (mean, 2.1 years). Nine hundred sixty-seven patients were followed for 1.1 years and 530 for 2.2 years. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Recurrent major cardiac event (either recurrent nonfatal infarction or cardiac death). RESULTS: Living alone was an independent risk factor, with a hazard ratio of 1.54 (95\% confidence interval, 1.04 to 2.29; P less than .03). Using the Kaplan-Meier statistical method for calculation, the recurrent cardiac event rate at 6 months was 15.8\% in the group living alone vs 8.8\% in the group not living alone. Risk remained significant throughout the follow-up period (P = .001). A disrupted marriage was not an independent risk factor. CONCLUSION: Living alone but not a disrupted marriage is an independent risk factor for prognosis after myocardial infarction when compared with all other known risk factors.
This article was published in JAMA
and referenced in Anatomy & Physiology: Current Research