alexa Long-term study of quality and safety of osseointegration for the retention of auricular prostheses.


Reconstructive Surgery & Anaplastology

Author(s): Westin T, Tjellstrm A, Hammerlid E, Bergstrm K, Rangert B

Abstract Share this page

Abstract The aim of this article is to describe the safety and quality of the osseointegrated implant technique for the retention of craniofacial prostheses, to present a protocol for collection of clinical data, and to discuss the impact of the procedure on the patient quality of life. A protocol was designed and used to study patients who had received auricular prostheses consecutively since 1979 at our department. The patients were asked to answer a questionnaire designed to describe symptoms and problems specific for someone wearing an auricular prosthesis. In total, 99 patients received 107 prosthetic ears (8 patients had bilateral defects) retained on 309 implants (2 to 4 implants/ear). Patients of all ages were represented, and only 9 discontinuities were reported. Most patients (95\%) wear their prosthesis every day, in most cases more than 10 hours/day. The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 12 years, giving a total of 2624 postoperative observations of implants, with a 3\% incidence of significant skin reaction. We conclude that the surgical technique for auricular prostheses retained on osseointegrated implants is simple and associated with a low rate of peroperative and long-term complications. It offers a high degree of stability and aesthetic satisfaction.
This article was published in Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg and referenced in Reconstructive Surgery & Anaplastology

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version