alexa Loop diuretic strategies in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Microbiology

Microbiology

Journal of Antivirals & Antiretrovirals

Author(s): Wu MY, Chang NC, Su CL, Hsu YH, Chen TW,

Abstract Share this page

Abstract PURPOSE: The safety and efficacy of continuous infusion vs bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics to treat acute decompensated heart failure were debated. Our aim is to compare the administration routes of diuretics in hospitalized patients with acute decompensated heart failure. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed to evaluate the effects of continuous infusion vs bolus administration of loop diuretics in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. The primary end points were urine outputs, body weight loss, all causes of mortality, and death from cardiovascular causes. Secondary end points were electrolyte imbalance, change in creatinine levels, tinnitus or hearing loss, and days of hospitalization. RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials with 518 patients were identified. Continuous infusion of diuretics was associated with a significantly greater weight loss (weighted mean difference, 0.78; 95\% confidence interval, 0.03-1.54) compared with bolus injection. Urine output, the incidence of electrolyte imbalance, change in creatinine level, length of hospitalization, the incidence of ototoxicity, cardiac mortality, and all-cause mortality showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Meta-analysis of the existing limited studies did not confirm any significant differences in the safety and efficacy with continuous administration of loop diuretic, compared with bolus injection in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This article was published in J Crit Care and referenced in Journal of Antivirals & Antiretrovirals

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords