alexa Low-dose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.


Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research

Author(s): BenDavid B, Miller G, Gavriel R, Gurevitch A

Abstract Share this page

Abstract BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The hypotension following spinal anesthesia remains commonplace in cesarean delivery. Intrathecal opioids are synergistic with local anesthetics and intensify sensory block without increasing sympathetic block. The combination makes it possible to achieve spinal anesthesia with otherwise inadequate doses of local anesthetic. We hypothesized that this phenomenon could be used to provide spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery while incurring less frequent hypotension. METHODS: Thirty-two women scheduled for cesarean delivery were divided into 2 groups of patients who received a spinal injection of either 10 mg of isobaric (plain) bupivacaine 0.5\% or 5 mg of isobaric bupivacaine with 25 microg fentanyl added. Each measurement of a systolic blood pressure less than 95 mm Hg or a decrease in systolic pressure of greater than 25\% from baseline was considered as hypotension and treated with a bolus of 5 to 10 mg of intravenous ephedrine. RESULTS: Spinal block provided surgical anesthesia in all patients. Peak sensory level was higher (T3 v T4. 5) and motor block more intense in the plain bupivacaine group. The plain bupivacaine patients were more likely to require treatment for hypotension (94\% v 31\%) and had more persistent hypotension (4.8 v 0.6 hypotensive measurements per patient) than patients in the minidose bupivacaine-fentanyl group. Mean ephedrine requirements were 23.8 mg and 2.8 mg, respectively, for the 2 groups. Patients in the plain bupivacaine group also complained of nausea more frequently than patients in the minidose bupivacaine-fentanyl group (69\% v 31\%). CONCLUSIONS: Bupivacaine 5 mg + fentanyl 25 microg provided spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery with less hypotension, vasopressor requirements, and nausea than spinal anesthesia with 10 mg bupivacaine.
This article was published in Reg Anesth Pain Med and referenced in Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version