Author(s): Kelly JF, Stout RL, Tonigan JS, Magill M, Pagano ME, Kelly JF, Stout RL, Tonigan JS, Magill M, Pagano ME, Kelly JF, Stout RL, Tonigan JS, Magill M, Pagano ME, Kelly JF, Stout RL, Tonigan JS, Magill M, Pagano ME
Abstract Share this page
Abstract OBJECTIVE: Anger and other indices of negative affect have been implicated in a stress-induced pathway to relapse. The Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) literature states that reduction of anger is critical to recovery, yet this proposed mechanism has rarely been investigated. Using lagged, controlled hierarchical linear modeling analyses, this study investigated whether AA attendance mobilized changes in anger and whether such changes explained AA-related benefit. METHOD: Alcohol-dependent adults (N = 1,706) receiving treatment as part of a clinical trial were assessed at intake and at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months. RESULTS: Findings revealed substantially elevated levels of anger compared with the general population (98th percentile) that decreased over 15-month follow-up but remained high (89th percentile). AA attendance was associated with better drinking outcomes, and higher levels of anger were associated with heavier drinking. However, AA attendance was unrelated to changes in anger. CONCLUSIONS: Although support was not found for anger as a mediator, there was strong convergence between AA's explicit emphasis on anger and the present findings: Anger appears to be a serious, enduring problem related to relapse and heavy alcohol consumption. Methodological factors may have contributed to the lack of association between AA and anger, but results suggest that AA attendance alone may be insufficient to alleviate the suffering and alcohol-related risks specifically associated with anger.
This article was published in J Stud Alcohol Drugs
and referenced in Journal of Psychology & Psychotherapy