alexa New algorithm for the localization of accessory atrioventricular connections using a baseline electrocardiogram.
Cardiology

Cardiology

Arrhythmia: Open Access

Author(s): Fitzpatrick AP, Gonzales RP, Lesh MD, Modin GW, Lee RJ

Abstract Share this page

OBJECTIVES:

In this study, we propose a new algorithm for accessory atrioventricular pathway localization using a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG).

BACKGROUND:

Radiofrequency catheter ablation produces a very discrete lesion, and ECG localization based on surgical dissection is obsolete.

METHODS:

Stepwise discriminant analysis was used to assess the relation of 18 pre-excited ECG (QRS duration > 100 ms) variables to the site of successful ablation in 93 patients. The most discriminating variables were combined to form rules for each location. The ECGs were retested by these rules to determine predictive accuracy.

RESULTS:

If the precordial QRS transition was at or before lead V1, the pathway had been ablated on the left side. If it was after lead V2, the pathway had been ablated on the right side. If the QRS transition was between leads V1 and V2 or at lead V2, then if the R wave amplitude in lead I was greater than the S wave by > or = 1.0 mV, it was right-sided; otherwise, it was left-sided (p < 0.0001, sensitivity 100%, specificity 97%). Right-side pathways. If the QRS transition was between leads V2 and V3, the pathway was right septal; if after lead V4, it was right lateral. If it was between leads V3 and V4, then if the delta wave amplitude in lead II was > or = 1.0 mV, it was right septal; otherwise, it was right lateral (p < 0.0001, sensitivity 97%, specificity 95%). In right lateral locations, if the delta wave frontal axis was > or = 0 degrees, or if it was < 0 degrees but the R wave amplitude in lead III was > or = 0 mV, it was anterolateral; otherwise, it was posterolateral (p < 0.0001, sensitivity 100%, specificity 87.3%). Anteroseptal pathways had a sum of delta wave polarities in leads II, III and aVF > or = +2(p < 0.0001, sensitivity 100%, specificity 100%). Posteroseptal pathways (inferior delta wave sum < or = -2) were less well discriminated from right midseptal pathways (inferior delta wave sum < or = 1 > or = -1) (p < 0.0001, sensitivity 76.5%, specificity 71%) [corrected]. Left-sided pathways. Two or more positive delta waves in the inferior leads or the presence of an S wave amplitude in lead aVL greater than the R wave, or both, discriminated left anterolateral pathways from posterior pathways (p < 0.001, sensitivity and specificity 100%). If the R wave in lead I was greater than the S wave by > or = 0.8 mV, and the sum of inferior delta wave polarities was negative, the location was posteroseptal; otherwise, it was posterolateral (p < 0.05, sensitivity 71.4%, specificity 100%).

CONCLUSIONS:

Using the algorithm derived, a right-sided accessory pathway can be reliably distinguished from one that is left-sided, right free wall from right septal, right anterolateral from posterolateral and anteroseptal from other right septal pathways. Left anterolateral pathways can be distinguished from left posterior pathways and left posterolateral pathways from left posteroseptal pathways.

  • To read the full article Visit
  • Open Access
This article was published in J Am Coll Cardiol. and referenced in Arrhythmia: Open Access

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

  • Ishfaq A Bukhari
    Protective Effect of Diltiazem and Fenofibrate Against Ischemia-reperfusion Induced Cardiac Arrhythmias in the Isolated Rat Heart.
    PPT Version | PDF Version
  • Antonio Ferrari
    Spontaneous Ventricular Arrhythmias in Early Clinical Trials A Report from a Single and Repeated Ascending Dose Study
    PDF Version
  • Mohamed Chahine
    A novel mechanism of an SCN5A mutation causing mixed arrhythmias associated with dilated cardiomyopathy
    PDF Version
  • Saverio Gentile
    Ion channels phosphorylopathy: 3rd International Conference on Clinical & Experimental Cardiology April 15-17, 2013 A link between genomic variations and heart arrhythmia
    PDF Version
Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

Agri, Food, Aqua and Veterinary Science Journals

Dr. Krish

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Clinical and Biochemistry Journals

Datta A

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9037

Business & Management Journals

Ronald

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Chemical Engineering and Chemistry Journals

Gabriel Shaw

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9040

Earth & Environmental Sciences

Katie Wilson

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

Engineering Journals

James Franklin

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9042

General Science and Health care Journals

Andrea Jason

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9043

Genetics and Molecular Biology Journals

Anna Melissa

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9006

Immunology & Microbiology Journals

David Gorantl

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9014

Informatics Journals

Stephanie Skinner

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Material Sciences Journals

Rachle Green

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9039

Mathematics and Physics Journals

Jim Willison

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

Medical Journals

Nimmi Anna

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9038

Neuroscience & Psychology Journals

Nathan T

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9041

Pharmaceutical Sciences Journals

John Behannon

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001Extn: 9007

Social & Political Science Journals

Steve Harry

[email protected]

1-702-714-7001 Extn: 9042

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords