Author(s): Blajchman MA, Slichter SJ, Heddle NM, Murphy MF
Abstract Share this page
Abstract Patients with severe thrombocytopenia are presumed to be at increased risk for bleeding, and consequently it has been standard practice for the past four decades to give allogeneic platelet transfusions to severely thrombocytopenic patients as supportive care. Platelet transfusions may be given either prophylactically to reduce the risk of bleeding, in the absence of clinical hemorrhage (prophylactic transfusions), or to control active bleeding when present (therapeutic transfusions). While no one would argue with the need for platelet transfusions in the face of severe bleeding, important questions remain about what constitutes clinically significant bleeding and whether a strategy of prophylactic platelet transfusions is effective in reducing the risk of bleeding in clinically stable patients. It is now uncommon for patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation to die of hemorrhage, but it is open to debate as to what degree platelet transfusions have been responsible for this change in outcome, given the many other advances in other aspects of supportive care. If a prophylactic strategy is followed, the optimal transfusion trigger or quantity of platelets to be transfused prophylactically per transfusion episode needs to be addressed in adequately powered clinical trials, but these remain highly controversial issues. This is because, until recently, there have been few high-quality, prospective, randomized clinical trial (RCT) data for evaluating the relative effects of different platelet transfusion regimens or platelet doses on clinical outcomes. Moreover, most of these RCTs have not used bleeding as the primary outcome measure. Two such studies on platelet dose have now been undertaken, the PLADO (Prophylactic PLAtelet DOse) and the SToP (Strategies for the Transfusion of Platelets) trials. Data from these RCTs are not contained in this overview, as these data have not yet been completely analyzed or submitted for peer review publication. In addition to the above, several recent observational studies have raised the possibility that there is not a clear association between the occurrence of a major clinical bleeding episode and the platelet count in thrombocytopenic patients. Such findings have led to the questioning of the efficacy of prophylactic platelet transfusions in all clinically stable patients, and whether a policy of therapeutic transfusions used only when patients have clinical bleeding might be as effective and safe for selected patients. At least two RCTs evaluating the relative value of prophylactic versus therapeutic platelet transfusions have been initiated in thrombocytopenic patients with hematological malignancies. One such study, known as the TOPPS (Trial of Prophylactic Platelets Study) study, is currently underway in the U.K.
This article was published in Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program
and referenced in Internal Medicine: Open Access