alexa One-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth.
Dentistry

Dentistry

Dentistry

Author(s): Cetin AR, Unlu N

Abstract Share this page

Abstract The aim of this study was to assess the clinical performance of three direct composite resins and two indirect inlay systems in posterior teeth using the modified USPHS criteria. A total of 100 restorations were placed in the molars of 54 patients by one operator. All restorations were directly evaluated by two examiners at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Statistical analysis was conducted using McNemar chi-square test at a significance level of 5\% (p<0.05). Recall rate was 100\% at 6 and 12 months, and all the restorations evaluated (i.e., 100\%) received Alpha rating for the criteria of retention and gingival adaptation. At 12 months for the surface texture criterion, 80\% of Filtek Supreme XT received Alpha rating while it was 95\% for Tetric EvoCeram and AELITE Aesthetic. For marginal discoloration, 85\% of Tescera ATL and Filtek Supreme XT received Alpha rating while it was 95\% for Tetric EvoCeram and AELITE Aesthetic. Further, none of the restorative systems received a Charlie rating for any of the criteria at all evaluation periods. In summary, all the restorations demonstrated clinically satisfactory performance with no significant differences detected among them.
This article was published in Dent Mater J and referenced in Dentistry

Relevant Expert PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords