Author(s): Bjerrum L, GahrnHansen B, Grinsted P
Abstract Share this page
Abstract OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether short-term treatment with pivmecillinam was more effective than sulfamethizole in patients with acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI). DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: General practice, Denmark. SUBJECTS: Patients (n = 167) with uncomplicated UTI confirmed by positive urine phase-contrast microscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Drug efficacy based on clinical and bacteriological cure. RESULTS: Urinary symptoms disappeared first in patients treated with pivmecillinam, but after five days there was no significant difference in clinical cure rate between the two antibiotics. At the follow-up visit 7-10 days after initiation of treatment, 95.4\% of patients treated with pivmecillinam and 92.6\% of patients treated with sulfamethizole had no persistent cystitis symptoms (difference 2.8\%, CI -4.5\%; 10.0\%). Bacteriological cure was observed in 68.8\% of patients randomized to pivmecillinam and in 77.9\% randomized to sulfamethizole (difference -9.2\%, CI -24.7\%; 6.3\%). Some 26.8\% of patients randomized to pivmecillinam experienced a new UTI within 6 months after treatment compared with 18.4\% of patients randomized to sulfamethizole (difference 8.4\%, CI -4.5\%;21.4\%). No patients developed septicaemia with urinary pathogens within one year after initial treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with a three-day regime of pivmecillinam experienced faster relief of symptoms compared with patients treated with a three-day regime of sulfamethizole. Five days after initiation of treatment there was no significant difference in clinical and bacteriological cure between the two antibiotic regimes.
This article was published in Scand J Prim Health Care
and referenced in Primary Healthcare: Open Access