alexa Placenta previa: a 22-year analysis.


Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research

Author(s): Frederiksen MC, Glassenberg R, Stika CS

Abstract Share this page

Abstract OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to identify what anesthetic method is safer for women with a placenta previa. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed all women with placenta previa who underwent cesarean delivery during the period January 1, 1976-December 31, 1997 at Northwestern Memorial Hospital. RESULTS: Of 93,384 deliveries, placenta previa was found in 514 women. Identifiable trends with time included an increasing incidence of placenta previa (r = 0.54, P <.01); cesarean hysterectomy (r = 0.54, P <.01); placenta accreta (r = 0.45, P <.03); and regional anesthesia (r = 0.84, P <.0001). The mean gestational age at delivery was 35.3 +/- 3.4 weeks and did not change with time. General anesthesia was used for delivery in 380 women and regional anesthesia was used for 134 women. Prior cesarean delivery and general anesthesia were independent predictors of the need for blood transfusion, but only prior cesarean delivery was a predictor of the need for hysterectomy. General anesthesia increased the estimated blood loss, was associated with a lower postoperative hemoglobin concentration, and increased the need for blood transfusion. Elective and emergent deliveries did not differ in estimated blood loss, in postoperative hemoglobin concentrations, or in the incidence of intraoperative and anesthesia complications. Regional and general anesthesia did not differ in the incidence of intraoperative and anesthesia complications. CONCLUSIONS: In women with placenta previa, general anesthesia increased intraoperative blood loss and the need for blood transfusion. Regional anesthesia appears to be a safe alternative.
This article was published in Am J Obstet Gynecol and referenced in Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version