Author(s): Leitner GC, Gruber R, Neumller J, Wagner A, Kloimstein P,
Abstract Share this page
Abstract BACKGROUND: Different systems for preparation of platelet-rich plasma are commercially available, but data for comparison of these systems have not been published so far. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated the performance of Vivostat PRF Preparation Kit, PCCS Platelet Concentrate Collection System, Harvest SmartPReP 2 APC 60 Process, and Fibrinet Autologous Fibrin & Platelet System. The preparations provided by these systems are platelet concentrates with high numbers of platelets in a small volume of plasma and PDGF-AB is released continuously during the 5 days after preparation. RESULTS: Vivostat PRF Preparation Kit, PCCS Platelet Concentrate Collection System, Harvest SmartPReP 2 APC 60 Process are comparable in platelet yield and total amount of released PDGF-AB after 120 h while with Fibrinet the lowest platelet yield and PDGF-AB content of supernatant was achieved. The ability of growth factor release was equal in all four systems. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, all four systems for preparation of platelet-rich plasma investigated result in considerable growth factor release. In what extent the total content of PDGF-AB as a consequence of platelet yield has an impact on wound healing has to be further investigated.
This article was published in Vox Sang
and referenced in Rheumatology: Current Research