alexa Post-stroke spasticity: predictors of early development and considerations for therapeutic intervention.
Neurology

Neurology

International Journal of Neurorehabilitation

Author(s): Wissel J, Verrier M, Simpson DM, Charles D, Guinto P,

Abstract Share this page

Abstract OBJECTIVE: The complexities of post-stroke spasticity (PSS), and the resultant difficulties in treating the disability, present a significant challenge to patients, stroke rehabilitation teams, and caregivers. Reducing the severity of spasticity and its long-term complications may be facilitated by early intervention, making identification of stroke patients at high risk for developing spasticity essential. Factors that predict which patients are at risk for the development of PSS are identified. TYPE: Systematic search and review LITERATURE SURVEY: A PubMed search of the following terms was conducted: predictors OR risk factors AND stroke AND spasticity. Studies discussing predictors of early PSS development and factors predictive of motor/functional outcomes and recovery were selected and reviewed in detail. SYNTHESIS: Several predictors of PSS have been proposed, based on studies conducted in patients within 6 months after stroke, including development of increased muscle tone, greater severity of paresis, hemihypesthesia, and low Barthel Index score. Predictors identified in later stages post-stroke (within 12 months) have also proved useful for clinicians, as has the consideration of predictors of motor and functional outcomes and recovery; yet there is a need for additional studies in this area. An understanding of these and other potential predictive factors--such as motor impairment, neurologic and sensory deficit, lesion volume and location, and associated diseases--has not progressed to the same extent and warrants further investigation. CONCLUSION: The studies discussed in this review support the notion that early identification of factors predictive of PSS should significantly affect the course of intervention, help target individuals who would benefit most from specific types and intensities of therapy, and possibly provide better motor and functional outcomes. Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. This article was published in PM R and referenced in International Journal of Neurorehabilitation

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Relevant Topics

Peer Reviewed Journals
 
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
 
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

 
© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version
adwords