Author(s): Button KS, Ioannidis JP, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J,
Abstract Share this page
Abstract A study with low statistical power has a reduced chance of detecting a true effect, but it is less well appreciated that low power also reduces the likelihood that a statistically significant result reflects a true effect. Here, we show that the average statistical power of studies in the neurosciences is very low. The consequences of this include overestimates of effect size and low reproducibility of results. There are also ethical dimensions to this problem, as unreliable research is inefficient and wasteful. Improving reproducibility in neuroscience is a key priority and requires attention to well-established but often ignored methodological principles.
This article was published in Nat Rev Neurosci
and referenced in Journal of Community & Public Health Nursing