alexa Quantitative distinction of unique vocal fold subepithelial architectures using optical coherence tomography
Reproductive Medicine

Reproductive Medicine

Clinics in Mother and Child Health

Author(s): Maturo S, Benboujja F, Boudoux C, Hartnick C

Abstract Share this page

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to quantitatively analyze ex vivo porcine, fetal human, and adult human vocal folds by use of optical coherence tomography (OCT). A secondary objective was to quantitatively discriminate among 1-, 2-, and 3-layer lamina propria structures. METHODS: We performed an analysis of the vocal folds of 10 adult pig, 3 adult human, and 2 fetal human vocal fold specimens using OCT and histologic techniques. We present a quantitative comparison of the OCT results and histologic findings. RESULTS: We found that OCT allowed for the visualization of the subepithelial vocal fold architecture of all imaged tissue, and that it revealed distinct characteristic signal intensities for each type of specimen. CONCLUSIONS: Optical coherence tomography was developed for in vivo imaging of biological microstructures. This study demonstrates the ability of OCT to differentiate between the vocal fold architectures of 3 histologically distinct types of vocal folds. Future studies aim to develop a quantitative optical imaging algorithm that can be used to facilitate an in vivo longitudinal clinical investigation of the changes that occur in this layered structure over time and maturation.

  • To read the full article Visit
  • Open Access
This article was published in Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. and referenced in Clinics in Mother and Child Health

Relevant Expert PPTs

Relevant Speaker PPTs

Recommended Conferences

Peer Reviewed Journals
Make the best use of Scientific Research and information from our 700 + peer reviewed, Open Access Journals
International Conferences 2017-18
Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Annual Meetings

Contact Us

© 2008-2017 OMICS International - Open Access Publisher. Best viewed in Mozilla Firefox | Google Chrome | Above IE 7.0 version